Login   /   Register   /   Create Post   /   Create Directory
PaSangLang  .com 

K L A N G    C O M M U N I T Y

Advance Search
15,163    0    0    0
Post by Jessica Watson   #123008    |    Feb 14, 2020, 4:53pm   |    Services
Previous    Next
PaSangLang Rating  :   Like 0    Dislike 0

The issues related to the legal status of polygamy tend to emerge more frequently nowadays. Under the impact of globalization and the number of people advocating Islam and other religious views, tolerance to polygamy tends to rise. These views appear to be in the direct opposition in relation to the current US laws and regulations. The issue under discussion is highly controversial as different experts advocate diverse views. However, if polygamy relationships are voluntary, the rights of the people who want to engage in them should be protected, and polygamy should be legalized.

Although the issues related to polygamy have existed for a long period, they were not topical in the past. The reason is that different cultures and countries were comparatively isolated from one another. Their interactions mostly included only trade and moderate migration. Therefore, the legal systems of different countries reflected the dominant cultural environment. Thus, polygamy was tolerated in Islamic countries, while it faced strict prohibition in Christian ones. However, such distinct legal approaches towards the same question cannot exist in the modern globalized society. As the rates of globalization and migration tend to rise, there is a need for the development of the universal standards for protecting the rights of people advocating different views in a similar manner.

Currently, there are two groups of opinions on this issue. To prove that polygamy should be legalized, it is reasonable to assess the arguments of people opposing it. For example, Witte provides a number of arguments against polygamy. They mostly refer to the religious aspects and the negation of the fundamental principles of morality shared by all Christians. Even if certain individuals accept Witte’s moral views, the following two problems emerge. First, it is evident that not all social members follow Christian doctrines. Thus, there are no rational reasons for imposing Christian morality on the representatives of other religions. Second, people should not confuse ethical issues with the legal ones. Any moral advocates should be free to promote the ideas they believe to be just and beneficial. However, they should not be able to use the power of prohibition to impose their views on others as well. Thus, if people voluntarily support monogamy, they should be free to make such a choice. Correspondingly, if they voluntarily support polygamy, the government should not prevent them from being involved in such relationships.

Friedersdorf proposes other arguments against polygamy. He develops the utilitarian case against group marriages based on the supposed negative historical experience when the rights of women and low-status men were violated. In general, this interpretation seems to be controversial because some Islamic countries demonstrate high standards of living and a comparatively high level of personal freedom. Moreover, the violation of individual rights can be effectively prevented because only voluntary polygamy should be legal. If any aggression emerges, it should be punished according to the existing legal norms. In this way, governments may establish a proper degree of individual rights’ protection.

In addition, Friedersdorf claims that plural marriage should not be considered as being a human right. However, this position seems to be unsupported by valid arguments. Individuals should be free to participate in any relationships as long as they do not violate the rights of others. If several adults voluntarily agree to establish polygamy relationships, the government should not initiate any legal discrimination against them. Thus, polygamy should be considered as a human right as it is a direct implication of respecting individual liberty and free choices.

On the other hand, the advocates of the legalization of polygamy evaluate this concept in the general framework of people’s rights. If such relationships do not involve coercion, they should be legal and enjoy the same protection as other forms of people’s voluntary relationships. Marvel states that the same principles that are applicable to same-sex marriages should be applied to polygamy as well. Consequently, people should be free to participate in any forms of voluntary relationships with others regardless of whether the majority of the population supports these views. No one should impose his/her views on others, especially through the utilization of any forms of violence or the threat of violence.

Deboer states that polygamy is an objective fact, and many families live this way in the modern days. Therefore, the legal environment should respond to these changing conditions. The situation where polygamy families are considered “marriage outlaws” is unacceptable. Therefore, the same legal standards should be applied to all forms of voluntary relationships among adults, since this will create the just social environment in which diverse ethical and cultural views can peacefully coexist with one another. It is especially important in the era of globalization and liberalization.

In conclusion, although the issues related to polygamy are highly controversial, they should not be ignored. The major ethical and utilitarian arguments of the opponents of polygamy appear to be incorrect since they violate basic human rights. Individuals should be free to participate in those types of voluntary relationships that meet their interests and needs. Thus, polygamy should be considered as a human right. If several individuals consider this option to be appropriate for them, they should have the legal opportunity to make such a choice. Neither the government nor any other institutions should discriminate against these people. The underlying reasoning of recognizing people’s rights is quite similar to that applied in relation to same-sex relationships. Regardless of one’s personal moral views, he/she should support the legalization of this form of relationships. If polygamy is legalized, the existing practices of “marriage outlaws” and hidden discrimination in this sphere will be eliminated.

Jessica Watson, writer at https://300writers.com/hire-a-grant-writer.html

Login is required to join this conversation
 Related post for Services 
•  How To Increase Website Traffic Through Google
•  GET BACK LOST LOVER +27788629017 - United States, United Kin
•  Welcome to Fast Bitcoin Private Key Hack
•  Welcome to Fast Bitcoin Private Key Hack
•  How to resolve HP Printer Not Activated Error Code 30
•  What's New in QuickBooks Desktop for Mac 2020
•  What's New in QuickBooks Desktop for Mac 2020
•  www.bitdefender.com/downloads
More ...
 Klang Weather Today ! 
 Join Us on Facebook 

About Us
Contact Us
Advertise with us
Why Us ?
Our Package
Our Sites
Klang Deals !
Klang Directory
Monthly Pick
Weather Forecast
Air Pollutant Index
Klang Agent
Pest Control
Internet Plans
Website / Software
Forum Topic
News Events Job Vacancy
Services Property Finance Community & Awareness
Entertainment Attractions Food
Health & Wellness Digital & IT Trading
Promotion Others
Terms of Use  •   Privacy Notice   Copyright ©2020 Pasanglang.com  •  All Rights Reserved